Skip to main content

The King James Version of the Bible is NOT the only Divine Word of God

A Berean's Journey: Examining Claims about the King James Bible

Across the internet, many people who hold the belief that the King James Bible is the only true translation of God’s Word often quote Acts 17:11. The verse describes the people of Berea who were praised because "they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." I agree with this principle wholeheartedly. We are all called to be like the ancient Bereans—to approach every claim, no matter how strongly held, with a willingness to examine the facts and search for the truth. The purpose of this website is to begin that journey together. We will examine specific claims often made by those who hold a KJB-only position. We will use historical documents, scholarly research, and of course, scripture, to understand these topics more fully. The comments section is open for respectful dialogue and for others to share their research, questions, and insights. Let's reason together in a full and honest pursuit of the ...

Who is this Woman in Revelation 17 and 18? Spoiler: she is the city of Rome

The Woman of Revelation: A Deeper Look at the Historical Clues

Have you ever wondered about the Book of Revelation's powerful imagery, especially the mysterious "Woman of Babylon" in chapters 17 and 18? Some people have claimed she's a prophecy about the Roman Catholic Church, but when you look closely at the details, a different and much more historically grounded picture comes into focus. This picture reveals a message that was not for a future church, but a powerful warning to the first Christians who were facing persecution right then and there.

Let's dive into the Bible's own clues and the overwhelming historical evidence that points to this woman being pagan Rome.


The Bible's Own Clues Are Historically Precise

The Book of Revelation is written in a coded language that spoke directly to its original audience. The author, the Apostle John, used symbols that were immediately recognizable to anyone living in the Roman Empire.

  • The Seven Hills Are a Geographical Lock: Revelation 17:9 states that the woman sits on "seven mountains." This wasn't a spiritual riddle; it was a clear geographical marker. Rome was famously known as the "City of Seven Hills," and this fact was a cornerstone of its identity, celebrated in its literature and even etched onto its coinage. For John's readers, there was no mistaking this reference.

  • "Babylon" Was Code for Rome: While the name "Babylon" might seem to point to the ancient Mesopotamian city, early Christians consistently used it as a code word for Rome. They did this for a powerful reason: just as ancient Babylon had conquered and exiled the Israelites, Rome had now become the great oppressor of God's people. This connection is seen in other biblical writings, such as 1 Peter 5:13, where the Apostle Peter sends greetings from the church in "Babylon," a widely understood reference to Rome.

  • Dressed in Royal Opulence: The woman is described as being "arrayed in purple and scarlet," and "adorned with gold and precious stones" (Revelation 17:4). These were not simply religious colors. Purple was reserved for Roman emperors and senators, a symbol of ultimate power. Scarlet was also a color of high military rank and wealth. The extensive list of precious goods mentioned in Revelation 18—from pearls and silk to spices and horses—is a detailed reflection of Rome’s vast economic power. The empire was a massive trade hub that brought the world's wealth to its doorstep. This was a critique of worldly materialism, not a specific church's adornment.

  • Drunk on the Blood of Martyrs: Perhaps the most chilling and historically significant detail is that the woman is "drunk with the blood of the saints" (Revelation 17:6). This directly refers to the real and horrific persecution that Christians were enduring. Under Emperor Nero, Christians were rounded up and publicly executed, often being set on fire to light his garden parties. Later, under Domitian, the persecution spread throughout the empire, with believers being executed for refusing to worship the emperor as a god. This was not a future event; it was a painful reality for John's readers, and the prophecy was a message of judgment against their tormentor.


What Historians and Early Christians Believed

The idea of Babylon as pagan Rome is not a modern theory invented to defend any church. It was the mainstream understanding of early Christianity.

  • Early Church Fathers like Irenaeus (a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the Apostle John) understood "Babylon" to be Rome. In his work Against Heresies (c. 180 AD), Irenaeus interprets the symbols as directly related to the Roman Empire and its imperial power.

  • The scholar Hippolytus of Rome (c. 170–236 AD) also identified the city in Revelation 17 as Rome, a view that was widely held in the early Christian church.

This interpretation is also the consensus among many modern non-Catholic scholars and historians. They argue that to understand Revelation properly, you must read it through the eyes of its original audience.

  • G.B. Caird, a British Protestant scholar, argues in his commentary on Revelation that the entire book is a dramatic and symbolic depiction of the struggle between God’s kingdom and the forces of evil represented by the Roman Empire.

  • Grant R. Osborne, a well-known evangelical scholar, agrees, stating that the "Woman of Babylon" is a symbol of Rome's religious apostasy and military power. This interpretation allows the text to speak to its original audience with authority and relevance.

In conclusion, when we look at Revelation with an open mind and a respect for history, the symbols become powerful, not confusing. The Woman of Babylon was a direct message of judgment against the pagan Roman Empire. It was a message that told the early Christians that despite the empire's power, wealth, and brutality, it would ultimately fall, and God would triumph.




Comments